On the HahaFiction shelf
The Rosie Project
The Rosie Project · Book 1 · 2013
Audiobook available · 7 hr 32 min
Genetics professor Don Tillman devises a questionnaire to find a compatible wife. Rosie Jarman fails his screening, yet he agrees to help her identify her biological father. Their work together keeps disrupting the rules he intended to follow.
From the publisher’s blurb
“The art of love is never a science”Read the full description at Simon & Schuster, publisher description
Paid link · We earn commissions from qualifying Amazon purchases. Affiliate disclosure
What makes it funny?
On a date, Don tries to settle an ice-cream disagreement with a blind taste test. He orders the samples, turns to conduct his experiment, and discovers that his date has left. His account treats the failed encounter as a problem with the evidence.
The comedy at work
Don describes ordinary social encounters with the precision he brings to research. Readers can spot implications that he misses, while his literal questions expose how much conversation depends on hints and assumptions. Simsion uses that access to Don's thoughts alongside the novel's brisk succession of scenes.
Try this if…
A warm romantic comedy for readers who enjoy elaborate dating schemes and a narrator whose certainty keeps meeting inconvenient human behavior. Rosie's search for her father gives the pair something practical to pursue while their relationship develops.
Good to know
Autism is a recurring subject, and the book uses the term Asperger's syndrome. The opening chapter includes sexual references, particularly in Don's descriptions of his friend Gene's behavior.
A few distinguishing details
- A questionnaire designed to screen potential wives
- A failed date turned into an ice-cream experiment
- A genetics project entangled with courtship
More funny romantic comedy
Sources & further reading
- Review
Review
- Series and audiobook edition
Book information
- Opening chapter
Reading sample
- Publisher
Publisher
- Audiobook edition
Publisher
Something we should correct? Let us know.




